Archive | February, 2009

Nights In Rodanthe – Blu Ray Review

21 Feb

picture-3“Nights In Rodanthe” is a progression of the weepy 40s films that had so much power. Despite the possibilities to be over melodramatic, there is a sense of calm balance to the proceedings. The images themselves work because they seem lifted from a novel (which they are). The setting itself is what allows it to breathe. The simple blue house provides the best amount of story structure because it is a place that nothing can break down. Diane Lane and Richard Gere work easily with each other and you see and know the history which works both for and against it. The resolution and soft touch of the director and succinct and effective supporting players in Scott Glenn and James Franco balance the proceedings. The Blu Ray transfer makes the ocean undeniably pop with the scenes on the beach and especially the initial flying shots looking quite beautiful.

In terms of the extras “Nature Of Love” speaks to the mythic elements of what the film tries to portray and the angle of chemistry between the two leads. Everything becomes about trust and finding that deep place of ebb, and not comfort, that defines great love. “In Rodanthe: Writing With Emmylou Harris” talks with the songwriter about composing her first song for film. The key here was capturing a balance of love and joy with the pain. It is about that moment when you realize that love is fleeting. The alternate scenes are primarily little bits and pieces although the image of a house floating away after the hurricane seems quite stunning but probably overdone. The director in his comments also talks about this area in the Outer Banks of North Carolina and why it is so susceptible to such storms.

“A Time For Love” has novelist Nicolas Sparks talking about what influences his writing. He also talks about teaching track at the local high school and the elements of his next novel which is about a soldier in Kuwait. Also included is the music video for “Love Remains The Same” by former Bush frontman Gavin Rossdale. I had no idea the song was attached to the film having only seeing the original cut of the video. “Nights In Rodanthe”, like and in a lesser way than its cousin “The Notebook”, examines love for all its traits in a necessary romantic overlay. Date night at the movies it is for sure. And it works in that way. Out of 5, I give it a 3.

Changing The Face Of Broadcast: NAPTE 09

3 Feb

NAPTE (National Association Of Television Program Executives) is an annual confab where both distributors and content producers move on the essence of what the next big angle on TV will be. However with the current economic state, the progression was slow.

dollhouse1.jpeg

Dollhouse – Premiere Screening Three weeks ahead of its February premiere, the first glimpse of the second pilot was shown. Eliza Dushku lights up the screen for sure as Echo. The initial aspect where she is playing a party girl is a little confusing but is titillating to say the least. The meat of the series is engaged with Echo stepping and taking on the persona of a negotiator. Again the total transformation of Dushku is there. This is what will sustain the series. The angle falls somewhere between “Dark Angel” and “My Own Worst Enemy”. The problem is that with the latter the audience got too much into the nuts and bolts of the series too quickly. If the awareness of Echo is allowed to grown organically (as in the first episode) where it is not overplayed, the series might survive these tough times.

In Conversation with BermanBraun In a changing world where people are shifting, the story of BermanBraun is interesting. The fact that it is topped by a former studio head (Gail Berman) and TV/Internet head (John Braun) gives it pedigree. However shifting into new spaces (like online) is always strategic. They discussed their new outing in detail. The first angle with Berman is how to keep successful: “Being facsile is the best advice. You need to be lean in terms of overhead”. Braun enhances this statement with his view of the multi-conglomerates whom both of them used to work for: “The biggest challenges that the big company has is that they have gotten too big through acquisition and have become very difficult to manage.” But in terms of the Internet in comparison to TV in terms of its monetization structure, Braun makes a very astute comment: “The online world is still being run by the people who invented the medium. The networks have had 60 years to mature into a business. The question you have to ask the big portals is: Who are you?”

As far as their first steps when they made the company, Berman lays it out: “We knew when we came together that it was likely a television company would be interested in us. We made a first look deal with Jeff Zucker at NBC. That was our first anchor. We also knew that the digital component would be a big one for us. The era of doing scripted series [online] was a bygone era. [After conceding that], Pepsi became a specific partner.” Braun adds to this statement in terms of revenue: “We do make money in the digital space but we didn’t want any debt or any equity partner. [That said] there is no money in one-off web series”. Berman enhances this point saying: “[Doing the on-offs] takes more elements than a TV show. We couldn’t figure out a way to monetize it.”

One of their big profile elements coming up is that they are launching a celebrity portal for Microsoft which does not have a centralized anchor despite the possibilities of MSN. What gets these executives nowadays is that as a higher level executive at a major company, you “are actually above the decision making process. It is the younger executives that do this.” In their own company to keep structure running and loose, they came up with two major rules: “Every day we have to have a couple laughs” and “No Assholes Allowed”. Berman also states that the keys to success are “You have to be great. You have to be lucky. And you have to be smart”. Braun follows up quickly: “And if you do everything right, you increase your chances to be lucky.”

Digital Studios: Where Is The Money? Creating content for the Internet and keeping it prevalent and cohesive is a challenge…and of course the definition of a digital studio changes all the time. Jordan Levin, CEO of Generate, who announced a deal with 20th Century Fox at NAPTE, takes a first go at its strengths: “We produce for all platforms. It becomes a process of where you go first. Digital offers the opportunity to control everything in a property. A digital studio [by extension] is a company that finances digital content.” Brent Friedman, a co-founder of Electric Farm, approached it from a different way. He was able to create high level projects in the digital world from “Afterworld” (which I first saw at Anime Expo two years ago) to his current foray with genre favorite Rosario Dawson with the cutting edge “Gemini Division”. But Friedman makes the point that these were never created to be on TV, but only online. “Gemini” was made over 30 episodes for 1.7 million. Friedman explains the evolution: “Every deal [we have made] has been different which shows how fluid the landscape is. On ‘Afterworld’ we produced 130 episodes which is about 5 hours of content. Bud TV paid a premium amount [to air it] while Sony licensed a mobile game for the project. For ‘Gemini’ [by comparison] we had a deal with NBC in place. We integrated product [deals] with Intel, UPS and Acura while Microsoft wanted to do something mobile.” The key with this kind of stacked deck is ROI where the success remains to be seen.

kring1.jpeg

Producing Alternate Reality with Tim Kring The creator of “Heroes” has become a mythological figure of sorts but, despite his seemingly stealth-like nature, he sat down for an extended conversation which was corralled around his intention to highlight the extensive online world that the series has created and maintained. Kring begins talking about the origins of “Heroes” saying: “[I thought] wouldn’t it be great to do a story…about [the fact] that there is an unsettled feeling that people have in the world.” Kring’s last series “Crossing Jordan” was a modest success but Kring felt a pull: “I started to realize the power of being a writer and became very burdened by that responsibility. I wanted to address the sense of global consciousness and did a lot of soul searching. I started to realize that there was this theme of inter-connectivity and how [we] bounce off one another. But when I started thinking about a sort of genre [whether it be] cop show, medical show or legal show…none of them had a broad stance. ‘Heroes’ didn’t come from that world but I live in a world where it was becoming. It is unbelievable how the comic book world has now become such a part of pop culture.”

Kring hones in on the spectre of the idea of “Heroes”: “The whole idea is that I wanted to create a post modern idea of what a superhero was. I became fascinated with the idea of ‘wouldn’t it be amazing if the Earth found a way to populate itself [again].’ It could be you. It could be me. I started to see [these people] in terms of basic archetypes: the cheerleader, the single mom.” Archetypes become an important unifying structure in the arcs: “What I find fascinating is the point of free will. If you are predisposed to do bad, you might walk through a wall to rob a bank. It depends on what your own base is.” He then described going in to sell the show: “There wasn’t really a one line pitch. I came in with the pilot pretty formed. I wrote it before I pitched it. I [think I] exuded an inevitability to it that was infectious. I didn’t tell them that I didn’t know where it was going from there.” In terms of the current progression where in order to keep elements high, characters need to be killed off, Kring responds: “The way we structured our deals with the actors…it was an ensemble serialized drama [and] it would become necessary to kill them. There had to be stakes for the audience. The kind of storytelling I wanted to do [I call] ‘haiku storytelling’. It was about ‘Can I tell a story in ten beats or five beats?’ It was also about dropping people into stories without a lot of explanation.”

Kring also addresses the non-studio shooting element of the show: “It was difficult production-wise. From day one, we were a traveling roadshow which is very expensive. We also decided to shoot it in a way that was reminiscent of a graphic novel. Aside from the standard coverage, we would do a crazy angle. And if you are shooting four scenes a day [like that], everything got bigger and bigger. From there, the show took off and had a life of its own.” The other angle with having such a big online fan base is how much popular outcry affects story lines if at all: “Fortunately, because of the way you make television and the schedule of production, we are usually three or four months ahead of where the audience is. There is no real immediate relationship to the audience in terms of the actual TV show. Maybe [though] it is different online.” Kring goes on to explain the inherent online aspect to the “Heroes” phenomenon: “The online aspect to the show was built in from the beginning. [The question was] ‘Where is the audience going’? To the Internet. We needed to cast a line. We started with a few simple ideas. The first one was an online comic book. We could have a story that veers [off the TV show] to the left and can end in the comic book. This would give you an ancillary view of the show. I didn’t have a lot of ideas. I was aware enough of ARG gaming to know that we would have a portal that dug you into a world. We had a confluence on events and that was that GE and NBC were very interested in being in the digital space. I pitched this idea that had this whole alternative platform. In a weird way, ‘Heroes’ became an incubation labratory and testing ground for the dot.com division (of NBC/Universal). It felt like the Wild Wild West.”

From there the different story lines had to be maintained. Kring speaks on the writing process: “The writers room on ‘Heroes’ is like the engine room. You have 10 writers in a room for about 10,000 hours. If you think about ‘Heroes: The Television Show’ as the mother ship, certain stories that don’t make it [there], come online. It is kind of a philosophy of taking a show [on] with a large canon. The wonderful thing about what we are doing laboratory is the purity of it.” In terms of creating cross over, Kring makes a concession: “We chewed through story very quickly. But the bigger thing was a zeitgeist idea. It was not the most original idea. It was an archetypal idea about good and evil and overcoming demons within yourself. This seemed to connect on multiple levels.”

Kring also speaks of the “Heroes” community as utterly “tech-savvy” and that has to do with the prevalence of the technology: “What you are going for is an open source revolution”. Kring speaks of his thoughts to found a foundation to foster this. He actually went up to meet with Google to push this possibility forward. After the meeting, he was walking out with a 25-year old [assistant from Google] who told him that he thought “this granting thing was kind of lame. A lot of people are doing that. You are storyteller. Nobody is doing that in the philanthropic world”. These words really stuck to Kring and he had to digest what it really meant. Kring knows the “Heroes” universe is huge: “We are doing so much content and are in a unique situation from stories to webisodes to games.”

In conclusion on the “Heroes” foray into this multifaceted world, Kring states: “I think ‘Heroes’ has now become a model of how to do this. The problem with most shows is that it wasn’t baked into their premise. With ‘Heroes’ it was never a struggle. It was an embarrassment of riches.”

TV Online: Is The Present The Future? The key with online elements especially with episodic is if people are watching your content and how can you make money off that? One of the most successful ventures in terms of launching its show has been ABC.com which has gotten major views on “Lost”. Exec VP of Digital Media at Disney, Albert Cheng comments on their angle: “We need to be proactive. There is a threshold that we have to figure out.” He uses an orange juice ad as an example. They found that if you increase the amount of ads 4-8 interweaving with the point of the programming, you don’t decrease the customer satisfaction with the player. Jordan Hoffner, Director of Content Partnerships at You Tube, talked about his experiences: “When we launched the overlay ad, some advertisers liked it but others said they didn’t want it, [Right now] I think the margin pressure at the ad agencies is very high.” It sounds like that the earlier adopters are in play but the consumer has yet to truly form a bond that the ad buyers can see to truly maximize their dollar.

The Future of Mobile TV In many countries, especially the Far East, delivery of digital video by mobile carrier is much more prevalent. As cell and data networks become even more powerful, this is the logical next step. As other conferences on this subject have stated, people are willing to pay for this mobile content since it is not the Internet. People have it ingrained in their minds that the Internet is free but providers can charge a premium for games or videos downloaded directly on the cell network. However, this panel initially suggested that although viewers want this and they subscribe to premium content, the growth in this area is flat. Different speakers on the panel brought different thoughts. Dan Hsieh, Special Advisor at ION Networks, states that the capability for HD is there on mobile while Ray De Renzo, SVP of Product and Programming was talking about personalized video on demand they are working on which operates just like the tickers on television but interacting with the content. Mobile TV is coming and the ideas are flowing but in this country it is not quite there yet.

NAPTE showed this year that the want for content is still there as long the economy rebounds at a certain point. Belts are being tightened and on the market floor, there was product still being shown. However, there seemed a bigger tendency, much like Sundance, to watch and see. Time will tell.

Following The Path: The 2009 Santa Barbara Film Festival – Feature

3 Feb

SBIFF1.jpeg

The Santa Barbara Film Festival continued to bring the best of the crop to the American Riviera. The parties still played in small contingents because of the status of the economy but within the structure offered a better perception of the reason to be there: the films. Despite this, the structure, coupled with the onslaught of NAPTE, made film watching a little more challenging while maintaining schedules.

Penelope Cruz: Performer Of The Year With her razor sharp performance, Cruz continued her persistence of vision which has already sustained her in recent years with her strong presence in Pedro Almodovar’s films among others. Deemed “The Enchantress” by Executive Director Roger Durling during his discussion with her at the tribute, she lives by the creed to go against type…and she will always make films in her homeland. Josh Brolin who presented Cruz with the award talked about the paradox of it: “For this, it is not for me. It is for Penelope. And I love that it is not for me. I get to focus on someone else and what an adorable person to focus on”. Cruz herself talked about the adulation associated with a nomination and people showering her with praise: “I just need to take a moment and not get too obsessed with it. I just want to enjoy it.”. Later that night at an art deco structure up on a hill outside Summerland, the twinkling of the offshore lights permeates as drinks and deals are discussed in shadow and light. As the music inside picks up the beat, the upstairs VIP swirls with vodka as poses are made and looks exchanged into the heat of the night.

The Jurors At the Penelope Cruz tribute, two actors acting as jurors from different backgrounds talked about their different approaches to this new angle of their professional lives. Rodrigo Santoro, best known for his turn as the Persian King in “300″, says: “Today I was in a movie theater at 8am watching a film. I have never done that before. It is a little weird because you have to position yourself as a little more analyzing than being lost in it.” By comparison, Efren Ramirez, best known to many as Pedro in “Napoleon Dynamite” had a more subtle perception having worked the festival circuit on previous films: “There is always a big divide between studio pictures and pictures that are good for the art. Being at a film festival, it is done for the art and the edge. I have seen six films already and two of them are very out there creatively. I think these are the new [artists] to see how far they can experiment and explore”.

berlin1.jpeg

Woman In Berlin This foreign film plays somewhat along the lines of “Black Book” with less panache. Granted the acting by the lead Nina Hoss is still undeniably good as is the man who plays a Soviet general who invades Berlin during WWII. The movie examines the plight of survival (of women mostly) and the psychological warfare that took place in maintaining. Most of it is a lot more intense than necessary because, despite some high stakes, the follow through in terms of repercussions is fairly static. But again that is reality since war operates that way as well.

$9.99 This stop motion film which hovers between the adult and child-like worlds does not know where it quite needs to be placed. It needed to jump into one side of the pool and go for the gold. The different specs of thought including an redeemed angel who is just as much of a snob as he was in life and a man who shaves all his hair on his way to becoming a quite different trophy for his model girlfriend has ideas that seem to spin out of control. The eventual redemption of the characters through self help books that sell for the above mentioned price just seems to reduce the progression to simple mathematics.

eastwood1.jpeg

Modern Master Award: Clint Eastwood With a distinct air, jumping over a guard rail through a bunch of fans behind presenter Sean Penn, Eastwood does know how to make an entrance. Up close at his age, the man is still virile in spades and seems fairly humble. He is a movie making machine and shows no signs of slowing down. Even with recent films like “Gran Torino” and “The Changeling”, he hit two significant strides. “Gran Torino” was a film he could not pass up and made it in Detroit. Watching some old spaghetti westerns clips, specifically a scene in total silence where he keeps shooting Van Cleef’s hat around, you can see that at times he has had as much influence on film making at a more subtle level as such luminaries with names like Chaplin. When he directed his first movie “Play Misty For Me”, he said he just walked in and asked Universal studio head Lew Wasserman if he could direct. Wasserman said yes. Wasserman then called back in Eastwood’s agent saying he would have to do it for no money.

Eastwood is on a winning streak and despite not being Oscar nominated for his two films this year, this coming year looks bright as he is about to start work on a film on Mandela in South Africa starring his old friend Morgan Freeman as the iconic leader in a role he was born to play. Sean Penn came up on stage to give the director that steered him to his first Oscar the tribute. Penn, as always in close proximity, has great humor which is sometimes lost in the press. The after parties for the Modern Master were split and seem to work on a better level at times than past years because the relaxation factor seemed to play into effect. The after party for people who wanted to mingle was held at the Harbor Restaurant at The Wharf where secluded booths looked out over the darkened beach as views of all things lovely were painted through lighted then dark aquariums. The VIP Party held late in a smaller venue next to the Palace off State had Eastwood leaving as we arrived around 12:30 with Penn staying a little later as the crab claws, luscious in their bouyancy were consumed and Jameson was toasted.

American Riviera Award: Mickey Rourke
After Moroccan food was celebrated in earnest, the Arlington played host to Mickey Rourke who with sitting up on stage for nearly two hours showed that his penchant has indeed changed somewhat. He attempted to explain his removal from the acting life that seemed so his. He was accepted into the Strasberg Studio and admits at times to following around Al Pacino. No wonder his greatest praise is attached to buoyancy Ford Coppola who he had a chance to work with in “Rumble Fish”. Looking at his early 80s films and having talked to Mickey recently one on one for “The Wrestler”, one can see regret surely but the work still remains. Michael Cimino also is painted as a necessary impression on the young Rourke. Mickey’s first on screen appearance was in the infamous “Heaven’s Gate”. Rourke recalls a moment where Cimino yelled in his face and reduced him privately to tears. This indicates the tremendously vulnerability that this man has and the honesty he has to share it. Rourke regards that he got into acting because he really wasn’t very good at thug life in Miami where he was trapped at times during what he calls the “Scarface” days. He went to NY with no money and ended up rooming with someone that was different than he was. He says that when he started acting he was working as a bouncer at a transsexual club in Manhattan. Mickey’s life story is nothing if not colorful and has the makings of a movie itself.

Rourke says he started to become upset at the system with “Year Of The Dragon” because the film was completely shunned by critics who just wanted to rip into Director Cimino for bankrupting MGM with “Heaven’s Gate”. The reality is that there are some moments in “Dragon” that are utterly beautiful especially one of Mickey breaking on a stoop in Brooklyn. The crucifixion of the movie is unfounded. But the shunning of that movie and of Cimino hit Mickey hard to the point that he literally checked out. There is the story that he was hardly there on “Angel Heart” but he said working with Alan Parker and Robert De Niro was something he couldn’t pass up. Certain roles past then become blurry for him despite interesting forays like “Barfly”, “Homeboy” and “Johnny Handsome” that never quite clicked with audiences. Surprisingly after committing himself to the boxing ring which destroyed his looks, it was Coppola that gave him a olive branch with “The Rainmaker”. Sean Penn, also a friend, also gave him a key role in “The Pledge”. He says that the comeback came but it took 14 years because he had burned every bridge.

In terms of future roles, he says the talk of “Sin City 2″ is just talk but depends on Rodriguez because Rourke admits that the makeup was hell. “Iron Man 2″ is still talk with nothing sealed. Rourke is hot again but he seems to be playing it loose. As he told me back in December, he wants to have as close to an experience that he had on “The Wrestler” with Darren Aronofsky with his future projects. The problem is that that ideal doesn’t always come to pass. But hopefully he can maintain some semblance of it. One of the great joys and surprises of the night was that Francis Ford Coppola came down from Northern California personally to give Mickey the award. You could tell from the surprise on his face that Mickey might not have known. That giddiness was there and it was really good to see that.

The after parties came in reverse first stopping by the VIP Party which was slightly bigger than the Clint Eastwood shindig. This took place in First American on State. The dancing continued as Coppola relaxed in the forward area completely at ease on a couch as the 80s music seemed to reverberate. As the late night entered and Mickey left the enclosed back area, the toasts continues as a white dress turned in view. State & A continued from the main party late night as Firestone warmed under the heat lamps, quietly assuming its place.

Closing Night After the documentary “Yes Madam Sir” won a bevy of awards at an morning ceremony as the Fess Parker Doubletree, a quick LA jaunt was needed before the closing elements of the festival were created. After a Deschutes hit the spot at Epiphany and a pirate skull spoke to the women, “Lightbulb”, the closing night film, spoke of the ideas that need to be pursued and those that don’t depending of the situation. At the after party at Soho, as the wind picked up, cigars were lit and the cast of characters joined the show. As the dancing continued inside from a waived vantage point, the year’s prospect came into focus as stories were told and lives exchanged.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.